Some people really do have the most extraordinary priorities.
Not only does Adele Grant believe her child should be taught that animals aren’t harmed in the production of meat (and is perfectly comfortable hounding schoolteachers out of a job to prove it), she also appears to think that this, from her Facebook page….
Put it away, love. You're scaring the kids.
….is an appropriate example to set for her 10-year-old daughter.
My work here is done.
STRONGEST POSSIBLE CONTENT WARNING! NOT SAFE FOR WORK!
Not that I imagine that this is by any means an isolated incident, but it is evidence of something free thinkers have long known to be self-evident, namely that the warped logic of the fanatical political extremist eventually leads him to his own self-destruction.
Thanks to the estimable Charles Crawford for flagging this.
Well, sadly, the redoubtable Andrea Charman has finally thrown in the towel and given up the unequal struggle against a group of flat-earther parents who believe their children should not be taught that meat comes from slaughtered animals.
I know who I’d like to slaughter.
It’s walking on eggshells time again, dear reader.
The Daily Bigot’s only gone and offended another shill for the calamitous experiment in social engineering that is multiculturalism. From the ironically titled Liberal Conspiracy (for as we all know, there is nothing liberal about the left)….
Apparently, we are supposed to infer from this harmless doodle that….
Yes, it’s really a man marrying a sheep in the name of “multiculturalism”. Because, you know, immigrants are clearly no different to animals.
Ever heard of the expression “reductio ad absurdam“, Sunny? It is an often-used weapon in the satirist’s armoury, but then humour has never really been the left’s strong suit.
Whether or not multiculturalism was the “primary point of the report or the speech” is irrelevant. The question should be, is the following true or not?….
But my sense from several discussions was there was also a subsidiary political purpose to it – boosting diversity and undermining the Right’s opposition to multiculturalism.
….and does it signify a calculated policy of undermining a millennium of culture (and harmonious integration by successive waves of immigrants) in order to promote a homogenised and compliant society?
The Daily Mail is an appalling rag but a disproportionate reaction like this, on one of the rare occasions when it gets something more or less right, only strengthens its hand, and destroys any possibility of arguing the issue from first principles, but then c’est toujours le métier de l’aile gauche.
The New Statesman (def: “disinterested promoter of the public good”. Oh, the irony!) has also weighed in and would like to know if we think the cartoon is indeed racist.
It would appear that there are limits to Sarah Palin’s objections to political correctness….
And yet, a mere five days earlier….
I think, kind of tougher to put our arms around, but allowing America’s spirit to rise again by not being afraid to kind of go back to some of our roots as a God fearing nation where we’re not afraid to say especially in times of potential trouble in the future here, where we’re not afraid to say, you know, we don’t have all the answers as fallible men and women so it would be wise of us to start seeking some divine intervention again in this country, so that we can be safe and secure and prosperous again. To have people involved in government who aren’t afraid to go that route, not so afraid of the political correctness that you know – they have to be afraid of what the media said about them if they were to proclaim their alliance to our creator.
Can you run that by us one more time, Sarah, love? Only this time in English?
There are millions of Americans who want to hand the launch keys to this rapture-ready loon.
They are also allowed to consume alcohol, drive, rear children, carry firearms and operate heavy machinery.
recent lies and distortions